This is a digitised version of an article from The New York Times’ print archive, before online publishing began in 1996. The Times does not modify, edit, or update these stories in order to maintain their original appearance. The digitization process occasionally includes transcription mistakes or other issues; we are working to fix these archival copies.

According to a research published today, newborns as young as 5 months old exhibit a rudimentary capacity to add and subtract even in the cradle.

According to the findings, newborns can tell whether basic arithmetic like one plus one or two minus one are done correctly or wrong. The infants in the research demonstrated knowledge of a bad answer by gazing longer at the unexpected outcomes.

According to the researchers, the discovery, together with corroborating evidence on newborns and animals, suggests that humans have an inbuilt proclivity for mathematics, as other scientists have theorised for language. ‘Baby Is Already Aware’

More immediately relevant to parents, the study gives fresh insight on the age at which a newborn first learns to count. The findings «mean that when parents start teaching babies numbers, they are not teaching the baby to recognise quantities per se, but rather the names — one, two, three — we use for something the baby already knows,» according to Dr. Mark Strauss, a developmental psychologist at the University of Pittsburgh.

The new discovery, reported in the journal Nature by Dr. Karen Wynn, a developmental psychologist at the University of Arizona, is «notable in the history of developmental psychology,» according to Dr. Peter E. Bryant, an Oxford University psychologist, in a journal editorial.

However, some experts disagree. «This study doesn’t necessarily show that infants understand maths,» Dr Patricia Bauer, a psychologist at the University of Minnesota, stated. «It could simply mean that they understand that the display had changed in a way that violated an expectation, but not that they understood the change in quantity.»

Other experts on child development acknowledged in interviews that the findings showing a rudimentary mathematical ability in infants were reasonable, even if they surprised most people.

«At first blush, it seemed far-fetched that infants could recognise simple numbers and maths,» said Dr. Lewis Lipsitt, a developmental psychologist at Brown University. «However, it now makes sense in light of a number of corroborating findings.» Mickey Mouse Offers Assistance

Dr. Wynn utilised a well-established and frequently used approach in the Nature study to determine whether newborns find an event unexpected or not: babies would gaze longer at something shocking than at something that fulfils their expectations or is familiar. For years, researchers have used this phenomena to examine newborns who are too immature to express their mental reactions in other ways.

Dr Wynn utilised four-inch-high Mickey Mouse miniatures to demonstrate maths challenges to the babies. For the issue one plus one, she showed the newborns one figurine, then covered it with a little screen. Then, in full view of the child, another figure was placed behind the screen by a hand. Finally, the screen was removed, revealing both figures. The length of time the infant stared at the two Mickey Mouse sculptures was monitored by video monitors.

Using the same method, the researchers would occasionally take the screen away to disclose an incorrect response, such as only one figurine or three when there should have been two. The newborns peered for many seconds longer in these circumstances, showing that they had expected the correct response and were shocked by the different number.

According to the researchers, the newborns’ response did not merely reflect an anticipation of more or fewer items. They discovered that in the one-plus-one trial, newborns watched longer when the screen was pushed away to reveal three objects rather than two. This demonstrated that the response was determined by the numerical answer rather than the expectation of more items.

«Infants can compute the results of simple arithmetic problems,» claimed Dr. Wynn. «It implies that we are gaining insight into the underlying architecture of an infant’s numerical abilities.» This primitive capacity serves as a foundation for future mathematical comprehension.»

According to Dr. Wynn, the findings suggest that there may be an inbuilt structure in the mind for understanding numbers, similar to what linguist Noam Chomsky has hypothesised for language.

Dr. Wynn’s findings are not the first to demonstrate rudimentary arithmetic ability in babies, but they are notable since her processes were meticulously devised to address methodological concerns raised in previous research.

The key point of contention had been whether newborns responded to the quantities of items or the patterns the objects produced. Two things, for example, can be viewed as a line, and three as a triangle, rather than as numbers per se. Dr Wynn overcome this obstacle by presenting the figurines in a queue, whether two or three at a time.

The discovery adds to previous results by other experts showing newborns have a limited capacity to recognise numbers.

Dr. Strauss of the University of Pittsburgh gave infants a series of pairings of items, such as toy elephants, in a typical research. When the babies became bored, he reduced the number of things displayed in succession to one, three, or four. The newborns gazed longer this time, which was believed to imply they could identify the difference between the numbers.

Over the last two decades, researchers have revealed an astounding range of mental talents in babies, «a creature which used to be thought to be utterly incompetent and ineffective,» Dr. Bryant noted. Among the shown skills of early newborns are: distinguishing items by their shape, size, and colour; and understanding that objects continue to exist when out of sight.

The idea that children are born with rudimentary math ability «is scientifically plausible because there is ample converging data,» according to Dr Rochel Gelman, a psychologist at the University of California, Los Angeles. She and her colleagues also note a growing amount of evidence showing numerous animal species, from birds to chimps, have comparable skills to recognise numbers and respond to changes in them.

Though child development specialists who are aware with the study on baby maths believe that it is sound, they differ on its implications. Dr. Bryant of Oxford University, for example, predicted in a Nature article that children who were better at recognising numbers might be more likely to be great mathematicians later in life.

References

Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023749
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023749
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023749
On the round number bias and wisdom of crowds in different response formats for numerical estimation
Core systems of number